DYRÍGO Research
Evidence first.
Then the consequence.
Every DYRÍGO investigation is produced by ThinkLab and published independently. We show what we found and what it means. We do not publish what we cannot support.
What DYRÍGO is investigating
Published
OECD measurement integrity
What a digital-government ranking measures — and what it does not.
Ongoing research
FIFA Governance
Ongoing DYRÍGO research into football governance, systems and decision-making.
In research
Ballon d’Or
An independent DYRÍGO investigation, currently in progress.
Coming
DGT / NIE
Parts 2 and 3 of Towards a Fairer System? — the journey and the access.
One series among our work · Four parts
Towards a Fairer System?
A planned four-part DYRÍGO ThinkLab investigation into how public systems are scored, how they are actually experienced, and what happens in the gap between the two. Part 1 is live. Parts 2 to 4 follow; their findings are not written before the work is done.
- Part 1 of 4Live
OECD / OESO
The Score.
Read the analysis - Part 2 of 4Coming next
DGT
The Journey.
- Part 3 of 4Coming next
NIE & Cita Previa
The Access.
- Part 4 of 4Coming later
Synthesis
The Reality Check.
Towards a Fairer System? · Part 1 of 4
Great Score. Proud Government. Angry Citizens. What Exactly Is OECD Measuring?
The OECD ranks countries on how customer-focused their digital government is. The score is real. Whether it means what people think it means is another matter.
How to read DYRÍGO research
- Every claim in an article is backed by the frozen report behind it.
- Organisations named in an investigation are given a right of reply.
- We publish evidence and consequence. The method stays ours.
Frozen research report · V3
DYRÍGO ThinkLab — OECD Benchmark Integrity Review V3
36-page report. The full evidence base behind Part 1 of Towards a Fairer System?. PDF.